As mentioned before, the overwhelming majority of ankle sprains will
get better with conservative care in 2-3 months. Once x-rays have
confirmed there isn’t any fracture, most sprains get better with
R.I.C.E., as well as bracing and protection. However, there are some
people who will continue to have pain and discomfort despite our best
efforts. The decision to go ahead with surgery is one that is
complicated. Both the patient and doctor will have to discuss and agree
upon a plan as a team. Let’s discuss some options.
One attractive
option is to do ankle arthroscopy. Similar to what is done in the
knee, a small fiber-optic camera is inserted into the ankle joint along
with a tool to remove any loose particles inside the ankle joint. With
multiple ankle sprains, pieces of bone, cartilage, or inflamed ligaments
can impinge on the ankle joint. Once loose particles are removed, pain
is lessened and improvement is seen. The main advantage to ankle
arthroscopy is that there are only 2 small incisions made where the
instruments are inserted. The incisions heal quickly and downtime is
usually 10 days to 2 weeks.
Another procedure that can be done is
called a Brostrom procedure. As we discussed, ankle sprains can cause
ligaments to tear. The Brostrom procedure attempts to sew back together
a ligament that is often torn in ankle sprains. It is sewn together
with a very strong suture material, so that stability is gained and pain
is minimized. This procedure requires a longer healing period as the
ligament fiber ends need to reconnect.'
In some cases, torn
ligaments are so bad that it is impossible to sow them back together.
In these cases, grafts can be used. There are many variations to what
can be done to recreate the ligaments. The doctor can use a graft made
from bovine or porcine sources, or harvest tendon from another source in
the body. Depending on which ligaments are torn, the doctor can adjust
what he uses to restore stability.
There are additional
procedures that exist to help a persistent ankle sprain. Work with your
doctor to decide which procedure best fits your situation.
Thursday, July 5, 2012
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Ankle Sprain Conservative Treatments
We talked last week about ankle sprains, how they happen, and what conditions predispose someone to getting one. Let’s now discuss some of the initial treatment available.
Fortunately, most ankle sprains will eventually resolve without long term issues. When compared to bone or muscle, a ligament’s blood supply is significantly less. Since blood carries oxygen and healing factors within it, blood supply partially determines how fast an injury heals. For this reason, ankle sprains heal slower than bone or muscles, resulting in about a 6-8 week heal time. A person can usually engage in full activity 3 months after the initial injury.
Conservative treatment for ankle sprains is what you might expect with any foot injury. After making sure there are no fractures with x-rays, ankle bracing, ankle taping, short leg casting, protection, RICE (rest, ice, compression, and elevation), anti-inflammatory shots, and anti-inflammatory oral medication have all been used to treat these types of injuries. A common regiment for treating ankle sprains is RICE for 2-4 days, followed by ankle bracing and strengthening exercises for a couple weeks. Once you can weight bear without discomfort, a short regiment of physical therapy will help you to regain confidence in the ankle.
You’ll notice that with the exception of physical therapy and anti-inflammatory shots, most of the treatments mentioned can be obtained over the counter. So you might wonder why you need to see your podiatrist. The reason is simple. What may feel like a simple ankle sprain might actually be an ankle fracture. In some cases, an ankle sprain might actually have damaged cartilage in the ankle, or broken one of the leg bones (the fibula) up close to the knee. If these injuries go undiagnosed and undertreated, there may be some irreversible damage done. Although a simple ankle sprain is more common, these other injuries happen often enough to warrant evaluation by a doctor.
If pain persists despite conservative measures, or you are someone who has chronic ankle sprains, surgical options may need to be discussed. At this point, the doctor will probably request an MRI to assist in planning what operation needs to be done. We’ll discuss these options next post.
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
What Do Podiatrists Do?
Podiatrists have long been known to be the people to see for
ingrown nails, hammertoes, and heel pain.
But today’s podiatrist does much more than that. Let’s first talk about their education, and
then what that allows them to do.
To become a podiatrist, after high school, a person must
attend an undergraduate university and receive a 4 year bachelor degree. Most choose to major in a science related
major, such as biology, chemistry, exercise science, physiology etc… By completing these degrees, they have taken
the necessary courses to prepare to take the Medical College Admission Test
(MCAT). An applicant then submits their
college transcript along with their MCAT score to a podiatric medical
college. Although separate from MD
medical schools, podiatric medical school’s curriculum is held to the same
standard of other doctorate level medical programs. After 4 years of medical school and passing
of board exams, a person must then complete a 3 year residency program at a
hospital somewhere across the country.
During these 3 years, a podiatrist receives their surgical training. And at last, once licensed, a person can then
practice as a podiatrist. All in all, a
licensed podiatrist receives at least 11 years of additional education after
high school.
As academic standards and competitiveness have increased,
the level of training has also increased.
Today’s podiatrist can still trim calluses and nails of high risk
patients like diabetic like we always have.
But they are also trained to fix ankle fractures, repair Achilles
tendons, and even put a camera into the ankle joint and clean it out like an
orthopedic surgeon commonly does to a knee.
Just like in many medical specialties, some podiatrists like to focus
their efforts in pediatrics, athletes, or geriatric patients. Even if the podiatrist you are seeing doesn’t
routinely treat your current condition, he/she surely knows of another
podiatrist in the community that does.
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Bone Scans
The last imaging technique we’ll discuss will be different
types of full body scans available, specifically used by podiatrists to
determine if bone infection is present.
A scan, either for bone or WBCs (white blood cells), is done
by injecting a very small amount of a specific type of radioactive dye into a
vein. This dye will then spread through
the body as the blood is pumped through all the bone, muscle and internal
organs. The dye contains a certain
substance that will bind to somewhere in the body. The dye for bone scans binds to bone that is
currently being remodeled. The dye for
WBCs will search out WBCs and bind to them.
The person is then scanned at different time intervals with a gamma
camera, which is able to detect where the most activity is concentrated. This can be very useful in diagnosing foot
conditions.
When it comes to podiatry, these scans are primarily useful
with diabetic patients. Diabetic
patients struggle with two conditions, osteomyelitis (bone infection) due to
ulceration, and Charcot Foot (a non-infected bone destructive process). These two conditions are sometimes difficult
to tell apart clinically. With infected
bone, both a bone and WBC scan will be positive, whereas only a bone scan will
be positive with Charcot. Bone scans can
give the podiatrist clues to which process if going on. Scans are generally cheap tests and readily
available.
A downside to bone scans is that they are not very
specific. There are many conditions that
will have a positive bone scan. A
fracture, infected bone, growth plates, arthritis etc. will all give positive
bone scans. So even if I suspect bone
infection, and the bone scan comes back as positive, I still have to perform
other tests to confirm my suspicions.
There could be another underlying condition giving the positive bone
scan test. This obviously limits their
usefulness. Some types of scans are technically difficult to perform, and
others are difficult to read. Scans also expose the patient to some
radiation, thus making it necessary to make sure these scans are not ordered
unless absolutely necessary.
Imaging techniques used by podiatrists are essential in
determining the source of patient’s complaints.
These techniques are very safe when used in the appropriate
situations.
Podiatric CT Scans
We’ve discussed some of the more well-known imaging
techniques used by foot doctors to help understand and diagnose foot pain. There are additional tests that podiatrists
use less routinely, but nonetheless give important information in the right
circumstances. Let’s discuss CT scans
and their use in podiatry.
If you remember when we discussed MRI, we talked about how a
magnet is used to take sequential slices through the foot, which are then
grouped together to give a three dimensional image of foot. CT scans are similar in that they take slices
of the foot like an MRI. However,
instead of using a magnet, CT scans use a computer that generates x-rays. Whereas regular x-rays only give a two
dimensional image, when grouped together, CT scan can give a 3D image.
CT offers some very useful advantages over other imaging
techniques. CT scans allow incredible
visualization of bone. In cases of high
impact injury like falling from tall heights, or dropping a heavy object on the
foot, bone can fracture into many small fragments. In many of these cases, surgery is required
to fix the fractures. CT scans can help
the surgeon to know before surgery how many fragments there are and where they
are located. This allows the surgeon to
plan in advance how to best go about repairing the fractures, and to make the
most appropriate decisions for the patient.
CT scans do have some limitations. The main disadvantage to these scans is the
amount of radiation the patient is exposed to.
When compared to a single x-ray, a CT scan exposes you to several times
over the amount of radiation. For this
reason, in podiatry, they tend to be ordered with very badly fractured heel or
ankle bones. Although CT scans can
differentiate between bone, tendon, and muscle, MRI gives a much clearer
picture of these structures without exposure to radiation.
Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Advanced Imaging: MRI
Prior to now, we have discussed ways a doctor can get an
image of your foot in the office.
However, as we discussed, there are times when a more advanced and
detailed image is needed. Magnetic
Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a great tool to use in these situations.
In order to obtain an MRI, a patient is placed in a room
with machine containing a giant magnet.
This magnet causes the hydrogen ions in your bones, muscle, and other
soft tissue to give off a signal that can be detected by a computer. Depending on the tissue, different signals
will be given off. The computer analyzes
the signals and develops a picture. Once
the 1st picture is taken, the machine moves a couple millimeters and
takes the next picture. If you can imagine slicing up a tomato or onion, an MRI
is like slicing the foot into many individual sections. These individual slices are then grouped
together so the doctor can get a good picture of the inside of the foot.
The major benefit to an MRI is that it can show bone,
tendon, and cartilage in a very detailed image.
This can be used by the doctor as a surgical planning tool before he
takes a patient to the operating room.
MRI can be helpful to diagnose a condition, but most problems can be
diagnosed during a routine office visit without the help of an MRI. Although there are exceptions to that rule,
an MRI is not usually ordered until the doctor and patient have agreed that
surgical treatment is needed.
Another benefit to MRI is that no radiation is received by
the patient, and it does not require a dye or contrast to be injected into the
patient. MRI is a completely noninvasive
imaging technique. For these reasons,
MRIs are very safe for the patient.
On the other hand, an MRI requires you to lie motionless for
an extended period of time. If you are
moving when the slices are being taken, the image becomes distorted and
impossible to interpret. This can be
somewhat uncomfortable. In addition, if
you have metal plates or screws in your body from previous surgery, the metal
will distort the image, making it hard to see anything. For that reason, some patients may not be
able to get a useful MRI. Lastly, MRIs
are very expensive. Most insurance
providers will not pay for an MRI until multiple conservative measures have
been exhausted with no improvement in treating the patient.
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Podiatric Ultrasound
I’m sure many of you hear the word “ultrasound” and
correlate it with pregnancy and gynecology, but ultrasound is a very safe and useful tool podiatrists have to
visualize and diagnose the source of a patient’s pain. Let’s discuss some of the pros and cons of
ultrasound.
First and foremost, ultrasound is very safe to the
patient. Ultrasound is simply a machine
that sends out sound waves at a certain frequency, which then forms an image
from how the waves bounce back. Most
importantly, no radiation or tissue damage occurs from these sound waves. This is supported by multiple studies and its
long and continued use in visualizing babies in utero. This long history of safety has led to the
development of ultrasound machines specifically made to see bone, tendon, and
ligament.
Secondly, ultrasound gives a real-time image. X-rays, MRI, and CT scans are frozen
images. Ultrasound gives a “living image”
so that as the patient moves the foot, the image reflects that movement. This gives the doctor more information on how
the foot is functioning as it moves.
Without this insight, the doctor might miss the true source of the
pain. Ultrasound can be used to
visualize bone as well as soft tissue.
In addition, when giving an injection, the doctor can give it under the
guidance of ultrasound. This can help
the doctor insure that the medicine is being placed in the area of
inflammation.
Lastly, ultrasound is inexpensive and convenient. Ultrasound machines for foot and ankle
imaging are very small and can be moved from exam room to exam room very
easily. When compared to CT scans and
MRI, ultrasound is much cheaper and therefore, insurances are more likely to
cover the cost. Ultrasound does not
require a dye to be injected into your veins (often needed for CT scans),
neither does it require you to lie motionless (as is needed with MRI). All in all, is a very cost effective way to
diagnose foot and ankle conditions.
The main disadvantage to ultrasound is that it requires a
trained eye to both know the mechanics of the machine and to read the
ultrasound image. Only after much
experience can a technician consistently read an ultrasound accurately. Your podiatrist will be able to correctly
interpret your ultrasound.
Now that we have covered the ways to image the foot and
ankle in the office, we will discuss the more advanced imaging techniques of CT
scans and MRIs in our next posts.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)